Kimi K3Moonshot AIOpen WeightsAI BenchmarksMegaBrain

Kimi K3: 2.8 Trillion Parameters, Half the Cost Per Task of Opus 4.8

Moonshot AI shipped Kimi K3 on July 16, 2026, the largest open-weights model released to date: 2.8 trillion total parameters, 16 of 896 experts active per token. It scores 57 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, behind Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol but ahead of Claude Opus 4.8, and it just took the #1 spot on AutomationBench-AA, the real-work agent benchmark we covered yesterday, at 53% versus Fable 5's 48.6%. It costs $3 / $15 per million tokens, the same headline price as Claude Sonnet 5, and is live on the MegaBrain gateway today.

2026-07-17Β·8 min read

TL;DR

  • 🐘 2.8T parameters, 16-of-896 experts active β€” the largest open-weights model shipped to date. 1M-token context, native multimodal input.
  • 🧠 57 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (#4 of 189 tracked models) β€” above Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5, below Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol.
  • πŸ† #1 on AutomationBench-AAat 53%, beating Claude Fable 5's 48.6% headline score from yesterday's independent real-work leaderboard.
  • πŸ’΅ $3 / $15 per million tokens, 90% off on cache hits ($0.30 cached input). Average cost per completed task: $0.94, against Opus 4.8's $1.80 and GPT-5.6 Sol's $1.04.
  • πŸ“œ Full weights ship by July 27, 2026. Available today via API, Kimi.com, Kimi Work, Kimi Code, and now the MegaBrain gateway.
2.8T
total params (16/896 active)
57
AA Intelligence Index
53%
#1 on AutomationBench-AA
$0.94
avg. cost per task

What shipped

Kimi K3 is a mixture-of-experts model with 2.8 trillion total parameters, of which 16 of 896 experts activate per token, giving it an activation ratio under 2%. It uses Moonshot's Kimi Delta Attention and an Attention Residuals mechanism, ships MXFP4 weights with MXFP8 activations, and holds a 1-million-token context window with native multimodal (text and image) input. Moonshot calls it β€œthe world's first open 3T-class model” while stating plainly in its own launch post that it β€œstill trails the most powerful proprietary models, Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol” β€” an unusually direct admission for a launch announcement, and an accurate one.

Where it actually lands

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, K3 scores 57, ranking #4 of 189 tracked models: behind Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol, ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5. On agentic and coding-specific evaluations the picture is more mixed and, in a few places, better than the headline index suggests:

BenchmarkWhat it measuresKimi K3 result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexComposite reasoning/knowledge score57 (#4/189) β€” above Opus 4.8, below Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol
AutomationBench-AAReal business-workflow completion, 657 tasks53%, #1 β€” ahead of Fable 5 (48.6%) and Opus 4.8 (48.5%)
GDPval-AA v2Real professional deliverables, agentic Elo1,668 Elo β€” behind Fable 5 (1,760) and Sol (1,748), ahead of Opus 4.8 (1,600)
AA-BriefcaseOffice/knowledge-work agent Elo1,547/1,548 Elo β€” 2nd behind Fable 5
Terminal-Bench 2.1Terminal/coding-agent tasks88.3 β€” narrowly behind GPT-5.6 Sol (88.8), above the 84.6 Moonshot cites for Fable 5 and Opus 4.8
SWE MarathonLong-horizon software engineering42.0 β€” leads the field (Opus 4.8: 40.0, Sol: 39.0, Fable 5: 35.0)

The AutomationBench-AA result is the one worth sitting with. Yesterday's deep dive on this exact benchmark showed the entire frontier field topping out under 50%, with Claude Fable 5's headline 48.6% score quietly depending on a silent fallback to Claude Opus 4.8 on roughly 18% of tasks. K3 clears that ceiling outright, at 53%, as a single model with no fallback disclosed β€” on a benchmark built specifically to catch agents that look good on paper and fall apart on real, rule-bound business work. Read the full AutomationBench-AA breakdown for the methodology this result is measured against.

The price: Sonnet-tier, half the cost per task of Opus

K3's sticker price matches Claude Sonnet 5's: $3 per million input tokens, $15 per million output tokens, with automatic prompt caching at a 90% discount ($0.30 per million on cache hits). Moonshot reports 90%+ cache hit rates on coding workloads, and independent tracking puts K3's average cost per completed taskat $0.94, against $1.80 for Claude Opus 4.8 and $1.04 for GPT-5.6 Sol β€” roughly half of Opus 4.8's per-task cost, achieved with 21% fewer output tokens than its own predecessor, Kimi K2.6, while gaining 13 points on the Intelligence Index.

ModelInput / output per 1M tokensCached inputAvg. cost / task
Kimi K3$3.00 / $15.00$0.30 (90% off)$0.94
GPT-5.6 Solβ€”β€”$1.04
Claude Opus 4.8 (max)β€”β€”$1.80

Weights, timing, and reach

Full open weights ship by July 27, 2026; the model is already live via the Kimi API, Kimi.com, Kimi Work (desktop), and Kimi Code (terminal). Had Moonshot shipped K3 even a month earlier, it would plausibly have held the #1 spot outright instead of trailing Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol β€” the frontier moved in the same window K3 was training. What it holds today, unambiguously, is the top spot among open-weights models on general intelligence, and the top spot among every model, open or closed, on the one benchmark built to measure real business work instead of exam questions.

Available now on MegaBrain

Kimi K3 is live on the MegaBrain gateway today under moonshotai/kimi-k3, at the same zero-markup, pass-through pricing as every other model on the gateway. It is now the default Kimi model surfaced in the model picker. Switching to it from any other model already on your MegaBrain integration is a one-line change:

import openai

client = openai.OpenAI(
    base_url="https://getmegabrain.com/api/gateway/v1",
    api_key="mb-your-key-here",
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k3",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Refactor this module to async and add tests"}],
)

Browse live pricing and the exact model ID on the models page. For a long-running coding or research agent on mhermes, K3's combination of a 1M-token context window and roughly half Opus 4.8's cost per completed task is worth routing to for anything that doesn't specifically need Fable 5 or Sol's extra headroom.

Sources

Moonshot AI's Kimi K3 launch post (kimi.com/blog/kimi-k3, July 16, 2026), Artificial Analysis's model page and AutomationBench-AA leaderboard, and independent benchmark aggregation. For the AutomationBench-AA methodology K3's 53% result is measured against, see yesterday's deep dive.

MegaBrain Gateway

500+ models. One API. No markup.

Use in Claude Code, Cline, Cursor, or any coding agent.

Try MegaBrain free β†’

Newsletter

Stay in the loop

Get the latest model comparisons and guides β€” no spam, unsubscribe anytime.